SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 410

ALOK SINGH
Satbir – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Atul Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT

ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL)

1. Satbir juvenile has approached this Court for enlarging him on bail in FIR No.61/2010 under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Khaidki Daula, District Gugaon.

2. In brief prosecution story is that on 6.3.2010 at about 11.00 p.m. the present accused and his co-accused, namely, Shishpal, Mukesh and Monu have murdred 15 years old boy Atul and thereafter have dumped his body in dustbin. The petitioner was arrested on 7.3.2010. The bail application moved by the petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 1.6.2010 by Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Gurgaon, on the ground investigation is still pending and there is every possibility of juvenile to try to tamper with the evidence, which would defeat the ends of justice. Feeling dissatisfied, juvenile has filed statutory appeal, which was also dismissed vide impugned order dated 15.6.2010 by Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon, observing therein that petitioner is the main accused; it was a blind and cold blooded murder; victim was also child, therefore, if petitioner is released on bail, it would defeat the ends of justice.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the peti










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top