SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 748

AJAY TEWARI
Sanjay alias Kala – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. B.S.Saroha, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT

Ajay Tewari, J.

1. This is a revision against concurrent conviction of the petitioner under Section 366 read with Section 377 IPC in case bearing FIR No. 310 dated 07.10.94 pertaining to Police Station City Bahadurgarh. Since the petitioner was a juvenile at the time of the commission of crime, he was sentenced to be kept in protective custody for a period of 3 years.

2. Learned counsel has stated that he is not arguing the case on merits but the fact is that by order dated 25.04.2005 the petitioner was released on bail after he had undergone 7 months and 17 days of the said protective custody. Learned counsel has relied upon Rajesh Kumar vs. State of Haryana 2011(1) RCR(Criminal) 830 wherein, in a similar situation the remaining sentence of the person was set aside since he could neither be sent to remand home nor to jail. In that judgment reliance was placed on Pradeep Kumar v. State of U.P., 1994 AIR (SC) 104 and Babban Rai and another v State of Bihar, 2008 Cri.L.J. 1038. Learned DAG has not been able to distinguish this case.

3. Consequently this petition is disposed of with a direction that even while maintaining conviction of the petitioner his sentence is reduced t



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top