SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2452

JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Satpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr.GS Sandhu, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr.Mehardeep Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur (hereinafter referred as “trial Court”) on 9.3.2009 whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence under Sections 307, 326, 324, 323 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced as follows:

Name of Sentence of Rigorous Sentence of Sentence of RI in default Sentence for the offence

Appellant imprisonment fine of payment of fine punishable under sections

Satpal Singh Seven years Rs.5,000/- one month 307 IPC

Three years Rs.2,000/- 15 days 326 IPC

One year Rs.1,000/- 15 days 324 IPC

One year Rs.1,000/- 15 days 323 IPC

All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. Brief facts of the case, as narrated in para 2 of the judgment of learned trial Court, are that:

“On 4.6.2007 a wireless message was received from SHO, P.S. Sadar, Sangrur that injured Krishan Singh son of Bhajan Singh resident of Sangheri was admitted in Civil Hospital, Sangrur and on receiving the message, HC Balwinder Singh arrived at C.H., Sangrur, where the doctor declared the injured unfit to make the statement. Then telephone was























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top