SHAM SUNDER
Lal Chand S/o Moma Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
SHAM SUNDER, J
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction, and the order of sentence dated 29.1.1990, rendered by the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge, Sirsa, vide which it convicted Lal Chand and Vakil Chand, accused (now appellants), for the offences, punishable under Sections326 and 324 IPC, and sentenced Lal Chand, accused, to undergo RI for a period of three years, for the offence, punishable under Section 326 IPC, and sentenced Vakil Chand, accused, to undergo RI for a period of one year, for the offence, punishable under Section 324 IPC, for causing injuries on the person of Harmesh Lal @ Ramesh Kumar, Lekh Raj, and Karmo Bai.
2. During the pendency of appeal, the parties entered into a compromise, being closely related to each other, as Ram Kishan, author of the FIR, is the real brother of Lal Chand, appellant, and real uncle of Vakil Chand, appellant, who is the son of Lal Chand, and Ramesh Kumar, injured, is the real nephew of Lal Chand, appellant, and his mother Ram Piari, is the real sister of Lal Chand, whereas, Vakil Chand, is the cousin of Ramesh Kumar, injured. Vide compromise deed (Annexure A/1), it was stated by them, that the parties being
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.