L.N.MITTAL
Lichhami Devi – Appellant
Versus
Bharpai – Respondent
L. N.MITTAL, J. (Oral) - C. M. No. 5746-C of 2011 :
It is stated that Annexures A-2 to A-7 are part of the lower court record, but Annexure A-1 is not part of evidence. Accordingly, prayer for placing on record Annexure A-1 is declined. Annexures A-2 to A-7 are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
Main Appeal:
Plaintiffs, who were successful in the trial court, but have been unsuccessful in the lower appellate court, have filed the instant second appeal.
2. Plaintiffs in the suit challenged consent decree dated 29.10.1992 suffered by one Fatta in favour of Zile Singh and Sat Narain (defendants no.1 and 2 herein) and sought consequential relief. Nanhu had three sons i.e. Fatta, Manphool and Moti Ram. Manphool died in the year 1970 or prior to it. His inheritance mutation was sanctioned on 13.08.1970 in favour of defendants no.1 and 2 herein, who are his sons. Fatta died in the year 1996. Moti Ram died in the year 2001. Moti Ram's son Ram Diya pre-deceased him in the year 1997. Plaintiffs are legal heirs of said Ram Diya being his widow, two minor daughters and a minor son. The plaintiffs alleged that transfer of one-third share of Fatta in the suit land in favou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.