SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 1129

RAM CHAND GUPTA
Khajan – Appellant
Versus
J. S. R. Land Developer – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

RAM CHAND GUPTA, J. (Oral) - C.M.No.12102-CII of 2011

Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 26.4.2011, Annexure P3, passed by learned trial Court, vide which petitioner-plaintiff has been directed to pay ad valorem court fee on the amount of consideration of sale deed.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by learned trial Court.

3. Facts relevant for the decision of present revision petition are that petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction that he is owner and in possession of the property in dispute and that respondents-defendants by playing fraud upon him, got his signatures on some documents on the plea that agreement to sell was being executed and, however, later on he came to know that, in fact, sale deed was got executed and registered by them in their favour.

4. Though the suit has been filed for declaration that the sale deed dated 30.3.2011 is null, void and not binding upon the rights of the pla













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top