SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 841

2011 (4) PLR 25
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RANJIT SINGH, J.
Resident Welfare Association, Gurgaon - Petitioner
VERSUS
Registrar Firms and Societies, Chandigarh and others - Respondents
C.W.P. No. 5091 of 2011
Decided on: MARCH 21, 2011

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Writ jurisdiction is not maintainable to challenge election disputes when a specific remedy is provided by statute.

Headnote:

Writ Petition - Election Dispute - Section 24 of the Society Registration (Haryana Amendment) Act, 2007 - The court discussed the provisions of Section 24 which govern the dispute regarding election of office bearers in a society. It highlighted the prescribed authority's role in hearing and deciding election disputes and the procedure for setting aside an election if corrupt practices are found. The court emphasized that the Act provides a complete mechanism for resolving election disputes, making writ jurisdiction inappropriate.

Fact of the Case:

A Welfare Association filed a writ petition to quash letters ordering fresh election and challenging the election of the President. The Association alleged that the authority was not taking action on their complaint and objection.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Act provides a mechanism for resolving election disputes and emphasized that writ jurisdiction is not appropriate for challenging elections.

Issues: The main issue was whether the writ petition was maintainable to challenge the election dispute.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of Section 24 of the Society Registration (Haryana Amendment) Act, 2007 and cited precedents to establish that writ jurisdiction is not maintainable to challenge election disputes when a specific remedy is provided by statute.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed in limine.

JUDGMENT

RANJIT SINGH, J. - A Welfare Association formed by residents of Housing Board Colony, 10-A, Gurgaon, has filed this writ petition for quashing of letters issued by respondent No.2, ordering fresh election of the petitioner-Association. The election of respondent No.3 is also put to challenge through the present writ petition. It is stated that election for a term of two years was held on 28.3.2010, in which Bhupinder Singh Yadav was elected as President of the Society. Respondent No.3 made a complaint, when respondent No.2 asked the former President to submit complete election proceedings. The former President accordingly submitted the requisite information on 29.4.2010. Respondent No.2, however, sought some more information and, thus, started going into the validity of election. This is stated to be beyond his jurisdiction. Respondent No.2 has also issued letter for holding fresh election and the petitioner-Association has now challenged the same after serving a legal notice. Grievance is that respondent No.2 is not taking any cognizance or action on complaint and objection being filed by the petitioner-Association.

2. How a private Society formed by residents of a Housing Colony would be in a position to maintain a writ petition about the election dispute could not be explained by the counsel in any manner. In response to this query raised by the Court, what all the counsel could state was that it is a registered Society and hence, respondent No.2 would have no jurisdiction to interfere in the election, which has been validly held. Though, attention of the Court was not drawn to any provisions either of the Society Registration Act, 1860 or of bye-laws, which would govern the election of the Society but in the writ petition, reference has been made to Section 24 of the Society Registration (Haryana Amendment) Act, 2007 (for short, “the Act”). This Section appears to govern the dispute regarding election of office bearers. This Section reads as under:-

“Disputes regarding election of office-bearers-

(1)The prescribed authority may, on a reference made to it by the Registrar or by atleast one-fourth of the members of a Society registered in Haryana, hear and decide in a summary manner by doubt or dispute in respect of the election or continuance in office of an office-bearer of such society, and may pass such orders in respect thereof as it deems fit: Provided that the election of an office bearer shall be set aside where the prescribed authority is satisfied-

(a) that any corrupt practice has been committed by such bearer; or

(b) That the nomination of any candidate has been improperly rejected; or

(c) that the result of the election insofar as it concerns to such office-bearer has been materially affected by the improper acceptance of any nomination or by the improper reception, refusal or rejection of any vote or the receipt of any vote which is void or by any noncompliance with the provisions of any rules of the society.

Explanation:-A person shall be deemed to have committed a corrupt practice who, directly or indirectly, by himself or by any other person -

(i) induces, or attempts to induce, by fraud, intentional misrepresentation, coercion or threat or injury, any elector to give or to refrain from giving a vote in favour of any candidate, or any person to stand or not to stand, or to withdraw or not to withdraw from being a candidate at the election.

(ii) with a view to inducing any elector to give or to refrain from giving a vote in favour of any candidate, or to inducing any person stand or not to stand as, or to withdraw or not to withdraw from being a candidate at the election, offers or gives any money, or valuable consideration, or any place or employment, or holds out any promise of individual advantage or profit to any person;

(iii) abets (within the meaning of the India Penal Code) the doing of any of the acts specified in clauses (i) and (ii);

(iv) induces or attempts to induce a candidate or elector t










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top