SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 1370

2011 (4) RCR(Civ) 490
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
K. KANNAN J.
Kanwar Singh - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Ministry of Power and others - Respondents
C.W.P. No.7902 of 2011
Decided on: 19.07.2011
C.W.P. No.9267 of 2011
Karan Singh - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Ministry of Power and others - Respondents
C.W.P. No.9268 of 2011
Nand Ram - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Ministry of Power, Shram Shakti Bhawan and others - Respondents
C.W.P. No.9291 of 2011
Rati Ram - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Ministry of Power and others - Respondents
C.W.P. No.10163 of 2011
Samundar Singh - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Ministry of Power and others - Respondents
C.W.P. No.10236 of 2011
Krishan Kumar - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Ministry of Power- Respondents
C.W.P. No.11676 of 2011
Sombir son - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Ministry of Power- Respondents

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate with Mr. Jaiveer Yadav and Mr. Gungan Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Maharaj Kumar, Advocate for Ms. Sharmila Sharma, Advocate, for Union of India in CWP No.7902 of 2011.
Mr. Maharaj Kumar, Advocate for Union of India in C.W.P. Nos.10163 and 10236 of 2011.
Mr. Ajay Kaushik, Advocate for Union of India C.W.P. Nos.9267, 9291, 9268 and 11676 of 2011.
Mr. O.P. Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana, Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate, for respondent Nos.3 and 4.
Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumeet Goel, Advocate, Ms. Sakya Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.5.

Headnote:

Electricity Act - Landowners - Electricity Act 2003, Electricity Act of 1910, Telegraph Act 1885, Land Acquisition Act 1894, Electricity Rules 2005, Electricity Rules 1952, Works of Electricity Rules 2006 - The judgment discusses the powers of the licensee to lay transmission lines, the relevant provisions under the Electricity Act 2003, and the exclusion of the Electricity Act 1910. It also addresses the objections by landowners, compensation, and the requirement for local address of the licensee within the State for effective public notice.

Fact of the Case:

The landowners filed writ petitions against the licensee for laying high tension wires over their lands, alleging violation of relevant laws and seeking compensation. The court examined provisions of the Electricity Act 2003, Electricity Act of 1910, Telegraph Act 1885, Land Acquisition Act 1894, Electricity Rules, and Works of Electricity Rules.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the actions of the licensee conformed to the law and directed the State Government to lay down appropriate conditions for a local address of the licensee within the State for effective public notice. The interim orders restraining the works of the licensee were vacated.

Issues: The issues involved the powers of the licensee to lay transmission lines, objections by landowners, compensation, and the requirement for a local address of the licensee within the State for effective public notice.

Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld the power of the licensee to lay overhead transmission lines without prior consent of the landowner and directed the State Government to ensure a local address of the licensee within the State for effective public notice.

Final Decision: All the writ petitions were disposed of, holding that the actions of the licensee conformed to the law, and the claims for compensation would be dealt with independently in the manner provided under the Telegraphs Act. The interim orders restraining the works of the licensee were vacated.

JUDGMENT

K. KANNAN J. - I. Synopsis

1. The above case and the batch of writ petitions are at the instance of landowners who are aggrieved by the action of the 5th respondent, licensee for laying high tension wires under the Electricity Act 2003, over their lands. The grievance is that the installations have been made in violation of the relevant laws and the rules and hence seek through their respective writ petitions that the respondents shall not lay down overhead high transmission power lines of 400 KV without following the due process of law under the Electricity Act, 2003 and the terms and conditions as stipulated in order dated 9.12.2010 issued by the Government of Haryana. The additional prayers are in alternation or addition that full compensation, rent and other incidental damages shall be given for the use of the respective lands for installing overhead transmission lines. The case calls to fore the examination of some of the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act of 1910, since repealed by the former Act subject to certain exceptions carved out in section 185, Telegraph Act, 1885, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Electricity Rules, 2005, Electricity Rules, 1952 and Works of Electricity Rules, 2006. The judgment traverses the requirements of notice, the extent of objections by landowners and the power of the licensee to lay overhead transmission lines, operating under the authority of the State and holds that there exists no violation of the relevant Acts or Rules to found a justification for the writ petitions.

II. Extent of Power to the licencee

2. By an order issued by the Government of Haryana, Power department on 9th December 2010, Jhajjar KT Transco Pvt Ltd, having its office at Gandhinagar, Gujarat, licence to lay transmission lines had been awarded to the 5th respondent. This purports to be an approval under section 68 of the Electricity for the transmission scheme between

(1) Jhajjar - Kabulpur (Rohtak), (2) Kabulpur – Dipalpur (Sonepat), Loop-in-loop-out circuit of Abdullapur-Bawana. The order states that the scheme includes transmission lines over 100 kms of agricultural lands, crossing over National and State highways, Railway line, Local Authorities Area, etc. The order further states that the licensee shall have all the powers under section 164 of the 2003 Act which the Telegraph Authority possesses under the Telegraph Act. The consent that the order contemplates is the consent of local bodies, Railways, National and State Highways, responsible for constructing transmission scheme and operate the same after approval of the Chief Electrical Inspector as per the provisions of the Electricity Act and the Rules. The approval is for a period of 25 years.

III. Relevant provisions under the Electricity Act, 2003 that deal with powers of the licensee and the extent of regulating the power by the ‘appropriate government’

(a) Rule making power of the Central Government and the subject covered

3. The Central Government’s power to lay down rules for the various purposes are governed by Section 176 of the 2003 Act. The language of the section in so far as it is relevant for transmission lines are contained in the following words:

"176(1): The Central Government may, by notification, make rules for carrying out the provisions of this Act.

(e) the works of licensees affecting the property of owner or occupier under sub-section (2) of Section 67;

(f) such other cases which may be prescribed under clause (c) of sub-section (2) of Section 68;

The relevant provisions may be reproduced to examine the subject for which the rules could be framed by the Central Government: Section 67. Provision as to opening up of streets, railways, etc.

(I) …………….

(2) The Appropriate Government may, by rules made by it in this behalf, specify,-

(a) the cases and circumstances in which the consent in writing of the Appropriate Government, local authority, owner or occupier, as the case may be, shall be required for carrying out wo

































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top