SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 494

L.N.MITTAL
Chotti – Appellant
Versus
Maya Devi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate for
Mr. G. S. Sidhu, Advocate for the appellant.

JUDGMENT

L.N. MITTAL, J (ORAL) - Chotti-Plaintiff has filed the instant second appeal, after remaining unsuccessful in both the Courts below.

2. Plaintiff-appellant and defendant Nos.4 to 9 (respondent Nos.13 to 18) are daughters of Harchand Mal alias Harchand Singh whereas defendant Nos.1 to 3-Madan Lal, Roshal Lal and Nasib Chand are sons of Harchand Mal alias Harchand Singh. Defendant No.1-Madan Lal had since died and is represented by respondent Nos.1 to 10 as his legal representatives whereas defendant Nos.2 and 3 are respondent Nos.11 and 12 herein. The dispute relates to inheritance of the suit land left by Harchand Mal alias Harchand Singh. Case of the plaintiff-appellant is that all the sons and daughters of Harchand Mal alias Harchand Singh i.e. both the parties inherited the suit land in equal shares i.e 1/10th share each. Accordingly, the plaintiff sought permanent injunction restraining defendant Nos.1 to 3, who claimed themselves to be exclusive owners of the suit land, from alienating the same without getting it partitioned.

3. Defendants No.1 to 3 set up registered Will dated 01.01.1985 executed by Harchand Mal alias Harchand Singh in favour of defendant Nos.1 to 3.









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top