2010 (2) RCR(Civ) 771
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VINOD KUMAR SHARMA, J.
Indian Sulphacid Industries Ltd., Upadhayay Marg, New Delhi - Petitioner
Versus
Radha & others - Respondents
C.R. No. 2217 of 2006
Decided on: 18.1.2010
Sick Industrial Companies - Motor Accident Compensation - Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Section 22
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner company sought to challenge the order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which dismissed their application under Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. The Tribunal had awarded compensation to the claimants against the driver and the petitioner, who was the owner of the vehicle involved in the accident.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner, being registered as a sick industrial company, was entitled to seek a stay of execution proceedings under Section 22 of the Act. The court also noted that the petitioner had successfully evaded the execution of the award, despite no stay being granted by the court.
Issues: The issues revolved around the interpretation and application of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, and the authority of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction in granting permission for execution proceedings against a sick company.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that there was a statutory bar to continue with the execution proceedings for recovery against a sick company, except with the permission of the Board. The court also directed the Board to dispose of the application for permission to execute the award within three months, considering the financial circumstances of the claimants.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petitioner's application under Section 22 of the Act and stayed the execution of the award against the petitioner alone. The impugned order was set aside, and directions were issued to the Board to expedite the consideration of the application for execution of the award.
VINOD K. SHARMA, J. (ORAL) - The petitioner company has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to challenge the order dated 4.3.2006, passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rohtak (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”) dismissing an application moved by the petitioner, under Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).
2. The learned Tribunal awarded compensation to the claimants, jointly and severally against the driver, and the petitioner, being owner of the Tata Sumo, which had met with an accident.
3. In view of registration of the petitioner as sick Mill with the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, the petitioner sought stay of execution proceedings by invoking Section 22 of the Act. Section 22 of the Act reads as under :-
“22. Suspension of legal proceedings, contracts, etc. -(1) Where in respect of an industrial company, an inquiry under section 16 is pending or any scheme referred to under section 17 is under preparation or consideration or a sanctioned scheme is under implementation or where an appeal under section 25 relating to an industrial company is pending, then, notwithstanding anything contained in the Companies Act, 1956, or any other law or the memorandum and articles of association of the industrial company or any other instrument having effect under the said Act or other law, no proceedings for the winding up of the industrial company or for execution, distress or the like against any of the properties of the industrial company or for the appointment of a receiver in respect thereof and no suit for the recovery of money or for the enforcement of any security against the industrial company or of any guarantee in respect of any loans or advance granted to the industrial company shall lie or be proceeded with further, except with the consent of the Board or, as the case may be, the Appellate Authority.
(2) Where the management of the sick industrial company is taken over or changed, in pursuance of any scheme sanctioned under section 18, notwithstanding anything contained in the Companies Act, 1956 or any other law or in the memorandum and articles of association of such company or any instrument having effect under the said Act or other law-
(a) it shall not be lawful for the shareholders of such company or any other person to nominate or appoint any person to be a director of the company;
(b) no resolution passed at any meeting of the shareholders of such company shall be given effect to unless approved by the Board.
(3) Where an inquiry under section 16 is pending or any scheme referred to in section 17 is under preparation or during the period of consideration of any scheme under section 18 or where any such such scheme is sanctioned thereunder, for due implementation of the scheme, the Board may by order declare with respect to the sick industrial company concerned that the operation of all or any of the contracts, assurances of property, agreements, settlements, awards, standing orders or other instruments in force, to which such sick industrial company is a party or which may be applicable to such sick industrial company immediately before the date of such order, shall remain suspended or that all or any of the rights, privileges, obligations and liabilities accruing or arising thereunder before the said date, shall remain suspended or shall be enforceable with such adaptations and in such manner as may be specified by the Board:
Provided that such declaration shall not be made for a period exceeding two years which may be extended by one year at a time so, however, that the total period shall not exceed seven years in the aggregate.
(4) Any declaration made under subsection (3) with respect to a sick industrial company shall have effect notwithstanding anything contained in the Companies Act, 1956 or any other law, the memorandum and articles
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.