2011 (3) RCR(Civ) 56
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJIVE BHALLA, J.
Kashmir Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others - Respondents
CWP No.4867 of 2010
Decided on: 24.12.2010
Mandamus - Mutation of Land - Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Sections 34, 35, 37 - The court discussed the statutory obligation on revenue officers to sanction a mutation particularly when a registered sale deed is forwarded to them. It highlighted the procedure prescribed by Rule 7.32 of the Punjab Land Record Manual and emphasized the importance of compliance with the manual. The court also clarified that contested mutations have to be decided in accordance with the procedure prescribed under Sections 34, 35, and 37 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to consider his application for sanction of a mutation based on a sale deed. The land was attached in execution proceedings due to default in loan payment, and the mutation could not be entered in the petitioner's name.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Registrar/Sub Registrar did not follow the prescribed procedure, leading to the petitioner's rights being jeopardized. It allowed the writ petition and directed the Naib Tehsildar to consider the petitioner's application for recording a mutation in accordance with the law.
Issues: Non-compliance with the prescribed procedure for mutation recording, failure of revenue officers to forward the sale deed, and attachment of land due to default in loan payment.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the statutory obligation on revenue officers to sanction a mutation when a registered sale deed is forwarded to them and highlighted the importance of compliance with the prescribed procedure for mutation recording.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the Naib Tehsildar was directed to consider the petitioner's application for recording a mutation in accordance with the law.
RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL) - The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to consider his application for sanction of a mutation on the basis of sale deed no.253 dated 23.05.1990.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that paragraph 7.32 of the Punjab Land Record Manual (hereinafter referred to as the Manual) provides that a Sub Registrar/Registrar, exercising powers under the Registration Act, shall after registration of deeds of transfer of agricultural land, forward such deeds to the concerned Tehsildar, in a memorandum prescribed by paragraph 7.32 of the Manual. The Tehsildar is thereafter required to forward the registration memoranda to the concerned Patwaris for entry in their mutation registers. A vendee therefore, is not required to approach a Tehsildar or a Patwari for sanction of a mutation except where some dispute arises. Para 7.32 read with Sections 34, 35 and 37 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, places a statutory obligation on revenue officers to sanction a mutation particularly when a registered sale deed is forwarded to them.
3. Counsel for the State of Haryana submits that after sale of the land to the petitioner, his vendee mortgaged the land with the Oriental Bank of Commerce and raised a loan. On account of default in payment of the loan, the land has been attached in execution proceedings. A mutation therefore, could not be entered in the name of the petitioner.
4. I have heard counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the statutory provisions. Para 7.32 of the Manual reads as follows:
“7.32. Procedure as regards registered deeds of transfer:-Registrars and sub-registrars send [on 15th and last day of each month] to tahsildars particulars of all registered deeds which purport to transfer agricultural land. The office kanungo forwards these slips [within three days of their receipt in Tahsil office] to the field kanungo of the circle who distributes them to the patwaris concerned. The form of notice is as follows:-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sr. Name Nature of Amount of Name Name No. Remarks
No. of the alienation and consideration and and and of
village the area, field money R/O R/O the where No. and entered in of of the registration
the land jamabandi the deed person person of the
is holding No. exe- to deed
situated of the land cuting whom
alienated and in the the
the case of deed land is
buildings situated alienated
with the
limits of a
municipal
committee, small
town committee
or notified area
committee
details of
property
according to
Section 21 (2)
of the
Registration
Act.
1 2 3 4 5
Serial No. Number of deed Name of village Date of field Remarks
Kanungo's report
returning the
Registration memo
to the
tahsil office
Where a deed is not to take effect immediately but after a specified period, this fact should be noted in the column for remarks.
(i) A file should be kept of all invoices received during the year and a fly index will be attached to it in the form usually adopted for miscellaneous files.
(ii) The registration memoranda should then be sent to the field kanungo, who will distribute them to the various patwaris for entry in their mutation registers in the usual way. The information in the memoranda is sufficient to enable the patwari to enter up the transfer in his register of mutations as soon as he receives them without reference to the transferee.
(iii) When the field kanungo hands over the memoranda to a patwari, the latter should make a note of the fact in his diary recording the serial number of the sheet received by him. The entry should be signed by the field kanungo. The patwari will then enter up in his register the mutations detailed in the memoranda [before the next inspection of the field kanungo], and endorse the fact of entry on the memoranda giving the serial number
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.