SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 1571

RAJESH BINDAL
Surinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bhupinder Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Rajesh Bindal, J

1. This is defendant's appeal against the judgment of reversal. The suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff was dismissed by the trial Court, however, the judgment of the trial Court was reversed in appeal by Lower Appellate Court.

2. Briefly the facts, as noticed in the judgment and decree, are that respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that he is owner in possession of the property and also for permanent injunction restraining the appellant from selling, mortgaging, alienating, transferring and disposing of the same in any manner whatsoever. It was claimed in the suit that property was originally owned by one Banta Singh, who had sold the same, vide sale deed dated April 21, 1937, to the father of the respondent-plaintiff, namely, Shri Pritam Singh, who died in 1950. The predecessor-in-interest of the respondent-plaintiff were owners in possession of the property ever since then. After the death of his father, the respondent-plaintiff requested for change of ownership in his name, mutation though was entered but not attested by the Assistant Collector. However, thereafter respondent-plaintiff is being shown in the revenue record as 'Billa Lagan









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top