SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 4470

VINOD K.SHARMA
Amarjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Bhupinder Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajit Sihag, Advocate, for the respondent.

JUDGMENT

VINOD K.SHARMA, J. - The petitioner by way of present revision petition has challenged the order dated 1-09-2006 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Karnal, vide which the application moved by the petitioner for waiving/condoning the statutory period of six months for grant of mutual divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act (for short the 'Act') has been declined.

2. The parties were married on 9th April 2000 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. However, no issue was born out of the wedlock. Later on due to indifference in thinking and different attitude, the parties could not adjust with each other and they decided to seek divorce by mutual consent and filed a joint petition under Section 13-B of the Act for dissolution of marriage on 24th July 2006. Their statements were recorded on 25th July 2006 and period of six months was given to rethink about reconciliation. The said six months' period is to expire on 25-01-2007.

3. The petitioner thereafter moved an application alleging therein that the father of the petitioner lodged FIR No.344 dated 11-8-2000 under Sections 406 and 498-A of Indian Penal Code in Police Station, Assandh, District Karna




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top