PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
I.S. Tiwana, J.
Shiv Kumar Gupta - Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab - Respondent
Crl. Misc. No. 7022-M of 1986.
Decided On : 3 February, 1987
Quashing - F.I.R. - Stay of Criminal Prosecution
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to quash the F.I.R. registered against them under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The disputed property was subject to ongoing litigation in the civil court, and the fate of the criminal case depended on the findings of the civil court.
Finding of the Court:
The court decided to stay the further investigation or the launching of criminal prosecution until the rights of the parties in the civil court were finalized.
Issues: Quashing of F.I.R., Interplay between Civil and Criminal Proceedings
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that it would be in the interest of justice to stay the criminal proceedings until the civil court's judgment on the disputed property was reached.
Final Decision: The petition for quashing the F.I.R. was disposed of, and the court ordered the stay of further investigation or criminal prosecution until the rights of the parties in the civil court were finalized.
ORDER
I.S. Tiwana, J.- In this petition for the quashing of the F.I.R. No. 91, dated August 30, 1986, registered against the petitioner under sections 447, 427, 379 and 506, Indian Penal Code, in Police Station, Kharar, I need rot go into the detailed facts for the simple reason that the parties are already litigating in the Court of Sub Judge 1st Class, kharar in Case No. 412 of 28.8.1935 with regard to their claims to the disputed property. The said Court has already granted a temporary injunction in favour of the plaintiffs, i.e. respondent No. 2, vide order dated August 28, 1986 (Annexure P. 5). It is also not disputed that the fate of the criminal case registered against the petitioner would depend upon the findings of the civil court with regard to the possession of the disputed property wherefrom the petitioner is alleged to have cut and removed certain euclalyptus trees, on August 27, 1986, i. e only a day prior to the filing of the above noted suit.
2. In the light of the facts and circumstances noted above, I deem it proper that instead of quashing the F.I.R. at this stage, the interest of justice would be better served if further investigation into the matter by the police or the launching of the criminal prosecution against the petitioner is stayed till the finalisation or crystalisation of the rights of the parties in the light of the judgment of the civil Court. I order accordingly. The petition thus stands disposed of.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.