SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 1448

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
P.K. Jain, J.
Mota Singh - Petitioner
Versus
The Executive Magistrate, Amritsar - Respondents
Criminal Misc. No. 11720-M of 1995.
Decided On : 20 September, 1996

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. H.S. Giani, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. N.K. Sammi, Advocate.

An Executive Magistrate cannot inspect the spot and hold a local enquiry himself in proceedings under Section 145 of the Code. He must refer the matter to the District Magistrate or Sub-Divisional Magistrate.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - SECTION 148 - LOCAL INQUIRY - EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE - JURISDICTION - INSPECTION OF SPOT AND LOCAL ENQUIRY - EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE CANNOT INSPECT THE SPOT AND HOLD LOCAL ENQUIRY HIMSELF - MUST REFER THE MATTER TO DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OR SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash proceedings initiated under Section 145 of the Code and pending in the Court of Executive Magistrate, Amritsar. The dispute arose from a complaint alleging that the petitioner had demolished a water tank and illegally occupied the land with the help of the police. The Executive Magistrate inspected the spot and initiated proceedings under Section 145 of the Code.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the Executive Magistrate's order dated 22.8.1994 (Annexure P-3) and the initiation of proceedings under Section 145 of the Code based on the said order were liable to be quashed being in violation of the express provisions of Section 148 of the Code.

Issues: Whether the Executive Magistrate can inspect the spot and hold a local enquiry himself in proceedings under Section 145 of the Code.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that Section 148 of the Code requires the District Magistrate or Sub-Divisional Magistrate to depute a Magistrate to make the inquiry and furnish him with written instructions. The Executive Magistrate cannot inspect the spot and hold a local enquiry himself. This view is supported by decisions of the Patna and Gauhati High Courts.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings initiated by the Executive Magistrate and his order dated 22.8.1994 (Annexure P-3). However, the court left it open to the Executive Magistrate to proceed on the complaint dated 19.8.1994 (Annexure P-2) and initiate any action under the provisions of the Code if the facts and circumstances so justified.


ORDER

P.K. Jain, J. - This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) for quashing the proceedings initiated under Section 145 of the Code and pending in the Court of Executive Magistrate, Amritsar.

2. The facts necessary for the disposal of this petition are that Amrik Singh, respondent No. 2 herein, addressed a complaint dated 19.8.1994 (Annexure P-1) to the Station House Officer, Police Station, Chheharta Sahib, alleging therein that on 18.8.1994 at about 11.00 a.m. he was detained at the said Police Station, and his absence, Mota Singh along with others, with the help of police demolished the chhabeel (a small place for storing water). It has been further stated that all those persons were drunk and were abusing his family members and that Mota Singh had threatened him with dire consequences. He sought protection from the said S.H.O.

3. On the same day, Amrik Singh moved a complaint (Annexure P.2) before the Executive Magistrate alleging therein that he was having the said small water tank in the name of Baba Kharak Singh for the last 7 yeas and S. Mota Singh Thekedar had demolished the same and illegally occupied the same with the help of the police. It was further alleged that Mota Singh had threatened him with dire consequences. He levelled allegations of illegal detention and harassment on the part of the police. He also alleged that the situation can deteriorate further resulting in murders.

4. On the said complaint (Annexure P.2), the Executive magistrate made a note to be discussed with D.C.. Thereafter the said Executive Magistrate inspected the spot in dispute on 22.8.1994, made enquiries on the spot and recorded his report dated 22.8.1994 (Annexure P.3) stating therein that due to the said illegal action of Mota Singh with the help of others, there was a lot of resentment in the village and an apprehension of breach of peace. Consequently, proceedings under Section 145 of the Code have been initiated.

5. It has been stated in the present petition that the proceedings have been initiated by the Executive Magistrate after inspecting the spot and preparing a report; that the entire dispute related to a spot from where drinking water was being made available to the people and the cattle, that the petitioner had thereafter filed a suit on 31.3.1994 against respondent No. 2 for a decree of permanent injunction, thereby restraining him from interfering in the peaceful possession of the petitioner over Khasra N. 113-Min wherein on application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, an ad interim injunction had been granted in favour of the petitioner thereby holding that the petitioner is in possession of the said land, and as such the proceedings under Section 145 of the Code cannot proceed.

6. On a notice, respondent No. 2 has reiterated the averments made by him in his two complaints (Annexures P.1 and P.2) and has pleaded that the civil suit relates to Khasra No. 1133-Min whereas the dispute in the proceedings under Section 145 of the Code relates to Khasra No. 1130 and 1131. He has supported action of the Executive Magistrate.

7. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties at length, I am of the view that the order dated 22.8.1994 (Annexure P.3), passed by the Executive Magistrate and initiation of proceedings under Section 145 of the Code based on the said order are liable to be quashed being in violation of the express provisions of Section 148 of the Code.

8. This section, so far as it is relevant for our purposes, reads as under :-

"148. Local inquiry :- (1) Whenever a local inquiry is necessary for the purposes of Section 145, Section 146 or Section 147, a District Magistrate or Sub-Divisional Magistrate may depute any Magistrate subordinate to him to make the inquiry and may furnish him with such written instructions as may seem necessary for his guidance, and may declare by whom the whole or any part of the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top