SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 1397

K.C.GUPTA
Jagsir – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R.K. Nagpal, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sidharath Sarup, AAG, Haryana.


ORDER

K.C. Gupta, J. - Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that there is non-compliance of Section 42 of the NDPS Act inasmuch as the raid was conducted after sunset and before conducting the raid, search warrant was not obtained and it was incumbent upon the officer concerned to reduce into writing reasons for not doing so. Having not reduced into writing reasons for not doing so. Having not done so, there is non-compliance of Section 42 of the Act.

2. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting on the merits of the case, let the petitioner be admitted to bail to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Fatehabad.

Petition allowed.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top