SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 912

V.M.JAIN
Hari Chand Dewan – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. R.K. Jain, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Yash Pal, AAG, Haryana.


JUDGMENT

V.M. Jain, J. - This is a petition under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code, filed by the accused-petitioners, seeking the quashment of the FIR, bearing No. 46 dated 5.2.2000, registered under Section 7/10 of the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 (hereinafter referred as to the Act), in Police Station, Saraikhwaja, District Faridabad, being an abuse of the process of Court.

2. In the petition, it was alleged that petitioner No. 1 was abroad due to his employment in the United Nations and had appointed petitioner No. 2, as his general attorney, vide General Power of Attorney, dated 19.1.1996. It was alleged that on the instructions of petitioner No. 1, petitioner No. 2 had sold the land to Vanita Aggarwal and Rajesh Gupta, in equal shares, vide registered sale deed dated 7.8.1997. It was alleged that the District Town Planner, Faridabad, lodged the aforesaid FIR without obtaining necessary sanction, as required under Section 11 of the Act. It was further alleged that no offence had been committed by the petitioners, inasmuch a petitioner No. 2 had sold the land only under the instructions of petitioner No. 1, being his attorney and had not committe








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top