K.S.GAREWAL
Jagir Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K.S. Garewal, J. - Adjourned to 3.10.2002.
Counsel for the petitioners submits that the occurrence had taken place in the house of the complainant, therefore, it was not in public view. Moreover, the complainant does not state that he belongs to a Scheduled Caste and that the accused were aware of this. Therefore, the prohibition contained in the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against grant of anticipatory bail may not be operative.
2. Moreover, the custodial interrogation of the petitioners may also not be necessary at this stage. Consequently, they are admitted to interim anticipatory bail. They shall surrender before the Investigating Officer on August 6, 2002. In the event of arrest of the petitioners, they shall be admitted to bail to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer.
Petition allowed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.