SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 516

HARJIT SINGH BEDI
Maya Devi – Appellant
Versus
Satyawan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Manjit Singh, Advocate for Mr. Ajai Lamba, Advocate.

ORDER

H.S. Bedi, J. - Maya Devi, complainant, was married to Satyawan on 1.3.1970. Some dispute arose between the parties in the year 1987 leading to proceedings before the Matrimonial Court. Maya Devi also filed a complaint under Section 494/109 of the Indian Penal Code on the allegations that Satyawan had contracted a second marriage with Saroj Bala and a child also had allegedly been born out of the marriage. The accused Satyawan, Chander Mukhi, his mother Saroj Bala, his wife, the mother of Saroj Bala and two others, namely, Dhana Ram and Dharam Singh were summoned vide order dated 5.8.1991. The complainant did not appear in Court on 20.1.1992 due to some misunderstanding on which the complaint was dismissed. She filed another complaint on which the accused were once again summoned to face trial under Section 494/120-B of the Indian Penal Code vide order dated 3.7.1992. A revision petition was thereafter filed by Satyawan before the Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar, who vide his order dated 8.3.1994 allowed the petition by holding that a second complaint was not maintainable.

2. It is in these circumstances that the present petition has been filed in this Court.

3. The learned c



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top