SAT PAL
Harniv Sandhu – Appellant
Versus
Sandeep Singh Sandhu – Respondent
Sat Pal, J. - This petition has been directed against the Order dated 15.6.1998 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh. By this order, the learned Additional District Judge has confirmed the order passed by the learned trial Court on 8.6.1998 by which the learned trial court had dismissed the application filed by the petitioner-plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC for interim injunction.
2. Mr. Chhibbar, the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner-plaintiff is admittedly the wife of the respondent No. 1 namely Sandeep Singh Sandhu and she is the daughter-in-law of respondent No. 2 Davinder Kaur Sandhu. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner-plaintiff had been put into possession of the suit premises by the respondents themselves when they were not prepared to keep her in the matrimonial home situated at Amritsar. He further submits that the learned lower appellate court has passed the impugned order on the wrong assumption that the petitioner-plaintiff has failed to establish her possession for a long period. In this connection he has referred to para 10 of the grounds of revision a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.