SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 4533

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Vinod K. Sharma, J.
Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and others - Petitioners
Versus
M/s. Guru Nanak Agriculture Engineering Works and others - Respondents
C.R. No. 3896 of 2006.
Decided On : 22 December, 2006

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. M.S. Khaira, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abinashi Singh, Advocate.

Headnote:

Electricity Act, 2003 - Jurisdiction of Civil Court

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiff filed a suit against the demand notice issued by the petitioner for clubbing electric connections and payment of a disputed amount. The lower courts granted injunction against the demand.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the matter in dispute was not covered under Section 126 or 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and therefore, the jurisdiction of the Civil Court was not barred.

Issues: Jurisdiction of Civil Court under the Electricity Act, 2003

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 145 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and found that the matter in dispute was not excluded from the jurisdiction of the Civil Court.

Final Decision: The revision petition was dismissed as the court found no merit in it.

JUDGMENT

Vinod K. Sharma, J. (Oral) - Present revision petition has been filed against the orders passed by the Courts below vide which the temporary injunction has been granted in favour of the plaintiffs-respondents on their depositing 20% of the disputed amount within 7 days. The directions have been issued to the petitioners herein to restore electricity supply to both premises within two days from the date of deposit of the 20% of the disputed amount and also not to bill the tariff rate by clubbing the accounts till disposal of the suit. The rights of the petitioner-defendants have been protected by the learned Courts below by ordering as under :-

"In case, the suit of the plaintiffs will fail, the plaintiffs will pay the entire due amount to the defendant which would have been due in case the electricity connection would have been clubbed but have not been clubbed due to the stay along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum till payment."

2. The only contention of the learned Sr. counsel for the petitioners is that in view of the provisions of Section 145 of the Electricity Act, 2003 the Civil Court did not have the jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit and, therefore, no injunction could have been granted. Section 145 of the Electricity Act, 2003 reads as under :-

"145. Civil Court not to have jurisdiction. - No Civil Court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any matter which an assessing officer referred to in Section 126 or an appellate authority referred to in Section 127 or the adjudicating officer appointed under this Act is empowered by or under this Act to determine and no injunction shall be granted by any Court or other authority in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any power conferred by or under this Act."

3. The reading of Section 145 of the Act shows that the matters falling under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003 are excluded from the jurisdiction of the Civil Court. Section 126 of the Act reads as under :-

"126. Assessment. - (1) If on an inspection of any place or premises or after inspection of the equipments, gadgets, machines, devices found connected or used, or after inspection of records maintained by any person, the assessing officer comes to the conclusion that such person is indulging in unauthorised use of electricity, he shall provisionally assess to the best of his judgment the electricity charges payable by such person or by any other person benefited by such use.

(2) The order of provisional assessment shall be served upon the person in occupation or possession or in charge of the place or premises in such manner as may be prescribed.

(3) The person, on whom a notice has been served under sub-section (2), shall be entitled to file objections, if any, against the provisional assessment before the assessing officer, who may, after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to such person, pass a final order of assessment of the electricity charges payable by such person.

(4) Any person served with the order of provisional assessment may, accept such assessment and deposit the assessed amount with the licensee within seven days of service of such provisional assessment order upon him:

Provided that in case the person deposits the assessed amount, he shall not be subjected to any further liability or any action by any authority whatsoever.

(5) If the assessing officer reaches to the conclusion that unauthorised use of electricity has taken place, it shall be presumed that such unauthorised use of electricity was continuing for a period of three months immediately preceding the date of inspection in case of domestic and agricultural services and for a period six months immediately preceding the date of inspection for all other categories of service, unless the onus is rebutted by the person occupier or possessor of such premises or place.

(6) The assessment under this section shall be made at a rate equal to one and-half ti












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top