SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(P&H) 581

H.S.BRAR, V.M.JAIN
Diwan Hira Lal Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:R.S. Mittal, Senior Advocate with Sudhir Mital, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

V. M. Jain, J. - In the present writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 22.12.1998, Annexure P-8 passed by the Financial Commissioner, Haryana vide which the Financial Commissioner has dismissed the revision petition under Section 18(6) of the Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the ground that the petitioners have filed the said revision petition before him after lapse of several years without giving any reason for not availing the remedies of filing appeal/revision before the Collector/Commissioner.

2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and after perusing the record, we find no ground to interfere with the order dated 22.12.1998, Annexure P-8 passed by the Financial Commissioner, Haryana. While dismissing the petition, the learned Financial Commissioner, observed that the petitioners did not bother to file any appeal/revision before the Collector/Commissioner against the order dated 16.5.1985 etc. and without exhausting that channel they filed the present revision petition and that too in 1993. Furthermore. the Financial Commissioner while dismissing the revision petition also placed









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top