M.M.KUMAR, T.P.S.MANN
Bhola Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
M.M. Kumar, J. - The prayer made in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of directions to the respondents to consider and decide his legal notice dated 5.11.2006 (Annexure P-2).
2. The undisputed facts are that the petitioner was convicted on 7.9.1989 by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Barnala, under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and also to pay a fine of Rs. one lac. In default of payment of fine, he was required to undergo imprisonment of two years. It is further undisputed that the conviction and sentence imposed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Barnala, has been upheld upto Honble the Supreme Court and the petitioner is serving the same. On the basis of order dated 2.9.2002, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Barnala (Annexure R-1), asking the Collector, Barnala to recover the amount of Rs. one lac of fine, as arrears of land revenue, the Collector has attached the entire land of the petitioner vide Rapat dated 10.10.2002, to recover the fine of Rs. one lac and no notice was issued to him in rega
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.