Bakhshish Kaur, J. - The petitioner aggrieved by the impugned order has preferred this revision.

2. The petitioner of the case briefly stated are that Smt. Surinder Kaur and others filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining Amarjit Kaur and other defendants from obstructing or causing any interference in the smooth running of petrol pump; in the name and style of Premier Auto Engineers, Gill Road, Ludhiana and causing illegal and forcible dispossession of the plaintiffs by defendant No. 3 from the petrol pump.

3. An interm injunction by way of filing of application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC was also prayed which was declined by the trial Court. In appeal, the order passed by the trial Court was affirmed. Hence this civil revision.

4. I have heard Shri Amit Rawal, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri T.P.S. Mann, learned Counsel for the respondents.

5. Shri Amit Rawal, learned Counsel for the petitioners has assailed the findings recorded by the courts below on the ground that the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 and defendant No. 3 are in possession of the suit property-defendant No. 3 in the written statement had admitted the case of the petitioner. The respond