Jawahar Lal Gupta, J. (Oral) - Respondents No. 5 to 8 filed an application for partition of the land on October 21, 1994. The petitioner raised certain objections. These objections were rejected by the Assistant Collector vide order dated July 31, 1995. The petitioner filed an appeal. It is dismissed by the Collector vide order dated October 29, 1996. The revision petition was dismissed by the Commissioner vide order dated November 19, 1998. The petitioner filed a second revision petition. It was dismissed by the Financial Commissioner on September 15, 1999. Hence this petition. The petitioner prays that the four orders passed by the revenue authorities, copies of which have been produced as Annexures P-1 to P-4 with the writ petition be set aside.

2. The claim made on behalf of the petitioner has been controverted in the written statement filed on behalf of respondents No. 5, 7 and 8.

3. Learned counsel for the parties have been heard. Mr. Mittal, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that a question of title is involved. The matter is pending before the Civil Court. The authorities have erred in rejecting the objections. Mr. Mani Ram, learned counsel appearing for r