PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
M.L. Singhal, J.
Mohinder Pal Kaur - Petitioner
Versus
Gurmit Singh - Respondent
Civil Revision No. 1196 of 2001.
Decided On : 1 June, 2001
Divorce - Hindu Marriage Act - Section 13-B
Fact of the Case:
Joint petition filed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act by both parties for dissolution of marriage by decree of divorce. The wife sought to curtail the waiting period of 6 months as provided in Section 13-B(2) to obtain a divorce with mutual consent earlier.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the waiting period of 6 months provided in Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act cannot be curtailed in a freshly instituted petition for mutual divorce. However, the waiting period can be curtailed if divorce proceedings have been pending for a long time and all efforts for reconciliation have been exhausted.
Issues: Whether the waiting period of 6 months as provided by the Parliament in Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act could be curtailed.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the provisions of Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act and emphasized that mutual consent must continue until the divorce decree is passed. The court also highlighted the importance of the waiting period in allowing parties to deliberate and seek advice before finalizing the decision to divorce.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the revision, affirming that the waiting period of 6 months provided in Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act cannot be curtailed in a freshly instituted petition for mutual divorce, but can be curtailed if divorce proceedings have been pending for a long time and all efforts for reconciliation have been exhausted.
M.L. Singhal, J. - This is a joint petition filed on 5.1.2001 under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act by Mohinder Pal Kaur (wife) and Gurmit Singh (husband) for the dissolution of their marriage by decree of divorce which the learned District Judge, Ludhiana has refused to allow prior to 5.7.2001 by curtailing the six months period as provided in Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act. It is this order dated 5.2.2001 which has been called in question by the wife through this revision.
2. In support of the submission that the waiting period of 6 months provided by the Parliament in Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act can be curtailed, the learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to Gurdhian Singh v. Gurmeet Kaur, 1997(2) RCR(Civil) 296. Notice of motion was given to the respondent. Shri H.V. Rai, Advocate accepted notice on behalf of the respondent. So that this point, whether the waiting period of 6 months as provided by the Parliament in Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, could be curtailed, is decided authoritatively, Shri Sanjay Majitha, Advocate was requested to assist the Court in this behalf. Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act reads as follows :-
"13B. Divorce by mutual consent - (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce may be presented to the district Court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 (68 of 1976), on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.
(2) On the motion of both the parties made not earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred to in sub-section (1) and not later than eighteen months after the said date, if the petition is not withdrawn in the meantime, the Court shall, on being satisfied, after hearing the parties and after making such inquiry as it thinks fit, that a marriage has been solemnized and that the averments in the petition are true, pass a decree of divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved with effect from the date of the decree."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Court can order the curtailing of this 6 months period to a lesser period in fit cases where the Court feels that the parties are mature enough and they have taken the decision to put an end to their marriage and free themselves from the shackles of marriage without any pressure, coercion of fraud etc. and after fully comprehending the pros and cons of this decision. It was submitted that this period of 6 months can be brought down to a lesser period and the court can order the dissolution of the marriage of the parties with their mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act where the court feels that the parties have taken a conscious decision to dissolve their marriage by mutual consent and that neither party has been induced into this decision through fraud, coercion, undue influence or misrepresentation. He submitted that the Court could order the dissolution of the marriage of the parties earlier than 6 months of the date of institution of this petition for divorce with mutual consent so that they did not waste any time and rather planned their future course of starting life de novo. He submitted that this period of 6 months could be brought down in cases where the Court feels that there was no use flogging a dead horse and that marriage be knocked out right now and the parties freed from the shackles of marriage so that they could plan their future course of starting life denovo and thus rehabilitating themselves.
4. We have to find out the intention of the Parliament when the parliament used the words in sub-section (2) of Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.