SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 151

JAWAHAR LAL GUPTA, N.K.SUD
Jagdish – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:S.D. Bansal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J. (Oral) - The petitioners in these two cases have applied for the allotment of shops in Jind. Their applications were accepted. The shops were allotted. However, the petitioners having failed to deposit the instalments the sites were resumed. The appeals and the revision petitions filed by the two petitioners having been dismissed, they have approached this Court through these two petitions. Counsel for the petitioners has referred to the factual position in C.W.P. No. 1320 of 2001. A brief reference thereto is appropriate.

2. On September 29, 1992 the petitioner submitted an application for the allotment of a shop in Jind, The lots were drawn on October 13, 1992. The petitioner was one of the successful contenders. The shop was allotted to him for a value of Rs. 2,20,500/-. On October 13, 1992 the petitioner deposited 25% of the price viz. Rs. 50,125/-. The remaining amount had to be paid in six half-yearly instalments along with interest at the rate of 12.5%. The first instalment had to be paid on or before May 1, 1994. The last instalment had to be deposited by November 1, 1996. The petitioner deposited the first instalment of Rs. 37,898.50 on May 9,









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top