SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 628

SWATANTER KUMAR
Ajit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Santokh Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M.S. Bedi, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 1:C.L. Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Swatanter Kumar, J. - This revision is directed against the order dated 29.1.1998 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Gurdaspur, while exercising its appellate jurisdiction, whereby the appeal preferred by Shri Ajit Singh was dismissed. The appeal was preferred against the order of the learned trial Court dated 19.2.1994 dismissing an application of the said defendant under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure.

2. A suit for possession by means of specific performance was filed by Santokh Singh against Gurbachan Singh. This suit filed by the plaintiff was decreed ex parte by the learned trial Court vide its judgment and decree dated 1.9.1988. Gurbachan Singh applicant filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 CPC stating that he had no knowledge about the pendency of the suit and he came to know of the passing of the ex parte decree only when notice of the execution proceedings was served upon him. Gurbachan Singh who filed the application, died during the pendency of the application/suit. Ajit Singh and others were then brought on record as legal representatives of the deceased. He claimed that he had come to
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top