SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 592

M.M.KUMAR
Navdeep Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Dilraj Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. P.S. Garaya, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

M.M. Kumar, J. - The question of law raised in this revision petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity, the Code) is whether a wife divorced under the customary law is entitled to claim maintenance from her husband to whom she married subsequent to the divorce. The wife petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 14.5.2001 passed by the Additional District Judge, Amritsar declining her application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for brevity, the Act) has approached this Court by filing the present revision petition.

2. Brief facts of the case which led to the filing of the present petition are that the wife petitioner filed an application under Section 11 of the Act being HMA No. 140 of 2000 against the husband-respondent levelling allegations that at the time of their marriage in March 1996 the husband-respondent has a spouse living at that time and, therefore, the marriage between the wife- petitioner and husband-respondent was a nullity. She has further stated in her application under Section 11 of the Act that one male child was born on 4.8.1999. The fact that husband-respondent had a spouse living at time of marria










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top