SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(P&H) 607

HARBANS SINGH RAI
Lila Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. V.K. Jindal, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. T.S. Bagga, Advocate for A.G. (Punjab).

JUDGMENT

Harbans Singh Rai, J. - Petitioner Lila Singh is undergoing imprisonment for life in Central Jail Patiala. He was less than 20 years of age at the time of the commission of the crime and there is no dispute that he has already undergone 11 years and one month of actual sentence and was granted 6 years and 4 months as remission. It is also not disputed that he fulfilled the conditions envisaged in paragraph 516(8) of the Punjab Jail Manual for his case for pre-mature release to be considered by the State Government.

2. Lila Singhs case for pre-mature release was considered in 1980 and was rejected in 1981. It was again referred to the Government and was again rejected in March, 1983. In the year 1986, again the State Government considered the case of the petitioner and rejected the same.

3. The petitioner has challenged the validity of the order of the State Government rejecting his case for pre-mature case and he has sought direction against the respondents to reconsider his case in accordance with law.

4. In the return filed by the respondents, it is stated that the premature release case of the petitioner was rejected by the Government after considering the relevant recor





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top