SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(P&H) 382

S.K.JAIN
Khushi Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Anil Khetarpal, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. S.S. Gill, AAG, Haryana.


ORDER

S.K. Jain, J. (Oral) - Vide his judgment of conviction and order of sentence, both dated 28.4.1988, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Karnal convicted Khushi Ram and Parshotam Dass, petitioners herein under Sections 325/34 Indian Penal Code and ordered each of them to undergo R.I. for a period of three years under Section 325 Indian Penal Code and S.I. for 3 months under section 323 Indian Penal Code Both the sentence were, however, ordered to run concurrently.

2. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioners had filed Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 1988 which was heard by Additional Session Judge, Karnal. Vide his order dated 13.5.1988, he accepted the appeal, set aside the judgment of conviction and of sentence and remanded the case to the learned trial court with a direction to recall Dr. Sachdeva, P.W.5, re-examine him, afford an opportunity to the accused to cross examine the said witness, record the statements of the accused under Section 313 Cr P.C., allow them a further opportunity to lead defence evidence, if any, and then decide the case afresh.

3. The said order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge has been impugned before this Court in this revision petition. The argument of the











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top