SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(P&H) 112

HARMOHINDER KAUR SANDHU
Krishan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sunil – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Varinder Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

H. K. Sandhu, J. - Dr. Krishan Kumar has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing complaint Annexure P-1 summoning order Annexure P-2 and subsequent proceedings arising out of the complaint Annexure P-2.

2. As per case of the petitioner, the respondent filed a complaint against him and his mother under Sections 406, 489-A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtak copy of which was Annexure P-3. The complaint was fixed for recording the statement of the complainant on 4th May, 1991 but as the complainant did not appear in the court on that day the complaint was dismissed vide order dated 4.5.1991 Annexure P-4. The respondent filed another complaint on the same facts before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtak and on the basis of the second complaint Annexure P- 1, the petitioner and his, mother were summoned to stand trial for the offences under sections 406/498-A, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code as per order dated 24th Jan, 1992 Anne P-2. The respondent deliberately concealed the factum of dismissal of her previous complaint Annexure P-3 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtak. Th









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top