SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(P&H) 252

HARMOHINDER KAUR SANDHU
Sanjiv Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Steel Rolling Mills – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. J.S. Toor, Advocate.
For the Respondent = Mr. R.K. Battas, Advocate.

JUGDMENT

Harmohinder Kaur Sandhu, J. - This judgment will dispose of Criminal Misc. No. 10749M of 1992, 10751-M on 1992, 10753-M of 1992, 10755-M of 1992 and 10757-M of 1992, all titled as Sanjiv Kumar v. M/s. Surendera Steel Rolling Mills, Mandi Gobindgarh.

2. M/s. Surendera Steel Rolling Mills, carried on its business of steel rolling at Mandi Gobindarh. This firm filed five different complains against Sanjiv Kumar, the present petitioner, for a offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act alleging that the petitioner purchased rolling material from the firm on different dates and issued five cheques for a total amount of Rs. 3,40,000/- The cheques were presented to the bank by the firm through its banker but the same were dishonoured by Union Bank of : India, Mandi Gobindgarh with the remarks refer to drawer, meaning thereby, that there was no arrangement to meet the amount of the said cheques in the account of the petitioner. The petitioner was fully aware at the time of issuing the cheques that the same would not be honoured when presented to the concerned bank, On receipt of notice from the bank on 14.2.1971 the petitioner was asked to make payment of the amount wit
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top