SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(P&H) 340

A.S.NEHRA
Banwari Lal – Appellant
Versus
Kanwar Lal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. B. S. Randhawa, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. S. S. Narula, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

A. S. Nehra, J - This petition for revision of the order dated 31-10-1990 of Shri N. L. Bhawaria, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Rewari has arisen in the following circumstances :-

2. Respondents filed an application under Section 133 Criminal Procedure Code, stating that the petitioners have encroached upon a thorough fare which was being used by the respondents as a path to their houses. The learned Magistrate issued notice to the petitioners who appeared before him but later on absented from the proceedings. Ex-parte proceedings were taken on 12-4-1990 against the petitioners. Shiv Lal son of Kanhya Lal and Durga Prashad son of Samma Singh, Ex-Sarpanch appeared as witnesses of the respondents and stated that they knew the parties and they had also seen the old house of the respondents. They further stated that Banwari Lal and Guggan sons of Dilsukh have constructed chappars without lawful authority two years ago and by raising chappars they have obstructed the path and on account of this the respondents have no access to their old house as the path has been blocked.

3. Petitioners filed an application on 25-5-1990 for setting aside Ex-parte order dated 12-4-1990. The ex-part







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top