SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(P&H) 63

HARMOHINDER KAUR SANDHU
Jagraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R.P. Dhir, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. D.S. Dhillion, AAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Harmohinder Kaur Sandhu, J. - Jagraj Singh has filed this petition under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code for quashing and setting aside Calendar presented by the police in the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Barnala, against the petitioner for proceedings under Section 182 of Indian Penal Code.

2. Brief facts of the case are that an occurrence took place on 17.7.90 regarding which case FIR No. 64 of 1990 was registered at Police Station, Sehna, under Section 324/34, Indian Penal Code against Sukhdev Singh son of Bhag Singh, Bhag Singh son of Chetan Singh and Jora Singh son of Himmat Singh, all residents of village Cheema, Tehsil barnala. The case was registered at the instance of the petitioner and on 24.7.1990 on receipt of X-ray report the offence was converted to Section 326, Indian Penal Code Police, however, did not arrest the accused in the case which led the petitioner to file a complaint in the Court of a Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Barnala, on 10.8.1990 for the same offences. On the basis of the complaint Sukhdev Singh and others were summoned to stand trial for offences under Sections 326/324/34 Indian Penal Code. The police after investigation did






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top