SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(P&H) 716

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
G.S. Chahal, J.
Kulwant Singh and ors - Petitioners
Versus
Smt. Kanta Rani - Respondent
Criminal Misc. No. 4605-M of 1992.
Decided On : 8 September, 1993

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. V.G. Dogra, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mrs. Alka Sarin, Advocate.

Jurisdiction of the Court for different offences under the Dowry Prohibition Act and Indian Penal Code.

Headnote:

Dowry Prohibition Act - Jurisdiction - Quashing of Proceedings

Fact of the Case:

The respondent filed a complaint against the petitioners for demanding dowry, maltreatment, and refusal to return dowry articles. The petitioners sought quashing of the complaint and summoning order.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the complaint for the offence under Section 498-A Indian Penal Code was not competent in the Court at Kapurthala, but the offence under Section 406 Indian Penal Code should be tried by the Court at Kapurthala.

Issues: Jurisdiction of the Court at Kapurthala for different offences under the Dowry Prohibition Act and Indian Penal Code.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the complaint for the offence under Section 498-A Indian Penal Code was not competent in the Court at Kapurthala, but the offence under Section 406 Indian Penal Code should be tried by the Court at Kapurthala.

Final Decision: The court partly allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings under Sections 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and under Sections 498-A Indian Penal Code. The respondent was given liberty to seek remedies under the law in the proper Court for the offence under Section 498-A Indian Penal Code and for offences under Section 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act after proper sanction.

JUDGMENT

G. S. Chahal J. - Kulwant Singh and his parents Sant Singh and Gurbachan Kaur, by means of this petition under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code seek quashing of the complaint pending in the Court of Additional CJM, Kapurthala and the summoning order dated 10.9.1991 and all consequent proceedings.

2. Kanta Rani respondent brought the impugned complaint Annexure P-1 against the present petitioners. The allegations made in the complaint may be briefly summarised as follows :-

3. The marriage of the respondent was solemnised with Kulwant Singh petitioner No. 1 on 2.27. 1990 at Kapurthala as per Hindu rites. The petitioners made a demand for dowry from the parents of the respondent as a pre-condition of the marriage and this demand had to be accepted under pressure. The articles of dowry were displayed in the presence of Gurmeet Singh, Sumer Chand, Paras Ram, Balbir Singh and other relations. The list of articles was prepared and one copy of that list was handed over to the petitioner and his father while the second copy was retained and the same is annexed with the P-2 complaint. Petitioners were not satisfied with the dowry given and they started maltreating the complainant and they used to give her frequent beatings and also used filthy language. Five months after the marriage, the petitioners turned the respondent out of the house in just wearing apparel and made a demand for a scooter and a fridge. Parents of the respondent along with respectables visited the house of the petitioner and gave Rs. 3,000/- and rehabilitated the respondent at the house of the petitioner. A month thereafter, petitioner again started maltreating the respondent and ultimately in Feb 1991, all the petitioners give severe beatings to the respondent. On her raising Raula, She was rescued by the residents of the Mohalla and she filed an application before the P.S. Ludhiana However, the police got a compromise effected. In the month of March, however, again she was turned out of the house after giving beatings. A Panchayat was then arranged, but reconciliation having not been arrived at, the parents of the respondent asked the petitioners to return the articles of dowry and other gifts, but they refused to hand over the same. Though further efforts were made to prevail upon the petitioners to return these articles, the petitioners lastly refused on June 22, 1991. That these articles of dowry had been given to her for her exclusive use and had been handed over to the petitioners with the condition that they shall be returned to her on demand.

4. The petitioners have challenged the prosecution for offences under Sections 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of want of sanction and under Section 498-A Indian Penal Code on the ground of jurisdiction of the Court at Kapurthala. Under the provisions of Section 8 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, no prosecution could be launched for offences under the Act without the previous sanction of the District Magistrate or such other officer as the State may appoint. This legal proposition, is not challenged by the learned counsel for the respondent.

5. In para 9 of the complaint, it has specifically been stated that the respondent had cohabited with Kulwant Singh petitioner at Mohalla Janakpuri, Ludhiana uptill March 15, 1991. Whatever acts of cruelty were committed towards the respondent were at the marital home of the respondent For these acts, only the Courts at Ludhiana had the jurisdiction to try the offence. 1, thus, accept the argument of the learned counsel that the complaint filed at Kapurthala for offence under Section 498-A Indian Penal Code was not competent.

6. With respect to the offence under Section 406 Indian Penal Code, there are specific allegations of the articles having been handed over to the petitioners who are the husband of the respondent and his parents and further that demands had been made but they had refused to return the articles. These allegations constitute a crimina


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top