SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(P&H) 520

J.S.SEKHON, A.S.NEHRA
Pritam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. S. S. Sidhu, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. S. S. Dhaliwal, DAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

J. S. Nehra, J. - This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 14.5.1992 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar by which Pritam Singh, Manjit Kaur, Lakhvinder Kaur Land Rajbinder Kaur have been convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life each.

2. The prosecution story, in brief, is as follows :

3. Daljit Kaur daughter of Joginder Singh complainant was married with Narinder Singh son of Pritam Singh appellant. The husband and other members of his family were not satisfied with the dowry given in the marriage of Daljit Kaur and they started maltreating her and asking her to bring more dowry. One month prior to her death the complainant supplied one T.V., one Refrigerator and one she-buffalo to the in-laws of Daljit Kaur. On 18.5.1990 complainant Joginder Singh and his son Amrik Singh went to her in-laws house to meet her. After taking dinner they slept in the courtyard. At about 9/10 P.M. they heard shrieks from the room where Daljit Kaur had been dragged in by all the four appellants and the appellants had bolted the door from inside. The complainant and Amrik Singh knocked at the d




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top