SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(P&H) 2

A.S.ANAND, FAIZAN UDDIN
Bimla Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Respondents:Mr. B.B. Singh, Advocate.

ORDER

Faizanuddin, J. - This petition arises out of a complaint having been made by one Smt Bimla Devi complaining that Shri P. Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad granted bail to the accused-Respondent 4, involved in a case under Sections 302/34 of the Penal Code for murder of her son, in G.R. No. 1619 of 1992, corresponding to Jorapokher P.S. Case No. 168 of 1992, despite the fact that the two earlier bail applications of the said accused were successively rejected by the High Court, Ranchi Bench. This Court had issued a notice to the respondents including the Judicial Magistrate, First Court, Dhanbad, Bihar requiring them to show cause why the bail granted to the accused be not cancelled. Respondent 3, Shri P. Kumar, Judicial Magistrate has sent his reply to the show cause stating that the accused Respondent 4 was granted only provisional bail which has been cancelled by him by his order dated June 8, 1993 and that the accused has already been taken into custody.

2. In view of the fact that the Judicial Magistrate at a later stage has himself cancelled the bail, it is not necessary for us to pass any order with regard to the petitioners prayer for cancellation of bail but the dis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top