1993 Supreme(P&H) 808
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
J. S. Sekhon and A. S. Nehra, JJ.
State of Punjab - Appellant
Versus
Jiwan Singh - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 291-DBA of 1988.
Decided On : 28 September, 1993
For the Appellant : Sh. S. S. Dhaliwal, DAG (Pb).
For the Respondent:Sh. P. S. Hundal, Advocate.
The definition of "grievous hurt" under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code requires a serious injury that affects the victim's ability to perform their daily activities or causes permanent disfigurement.
Headnote:
CRIMINAL APPEAL - SECTION 326, 326/34 INDIAN PENAL CODE - FACTUAL MATRIX - MEDICAL EVIDENCE - INTERPRETATION OF INJURIES - CLASSIFICATION OF INJURIES - APPLICATION OF SECTION 326 IPC - JUDICIAL REVIEW.
Fact of the Case:
The prosecution alleged that the respondents attacked the complainant and other injured persons with sharp-edged and blunt weapons, causing grievous injuries. The trial court convicted the respondents under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including Section 326 (grievous hurt with a dangerous weapon). However, the Additional Sessions Judge acquitted the respondents under Section 326, while upholding their convictions under other sections.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court held that the injuries sustained by the complainant and other injured persons were superficial and did not amount to grievous hurt as defined under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code. The court relied on the medical evidence, which indicated that the injuries were not deep and did not cause any serious harm.
Issues: 1. Whether the injuries sustained by the complainant and other injured persons amounted to grievous hurt under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Whether the Additional Sessions Judge erred in acquitting the respondents under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the term "grievous hurt" under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code as requiring a serious injury that affects the victim's ability to perform their daily activities or causes permanent disfigurement. The court found that the injuries sustained by the complainant and other injured persons did not meet this threshold, as they were superficial and did not cause any lasting harm.
Final Decision: The High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of the respondents under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code.
A. S. Nehra, J. - The Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar, vide his judgment dated August 6, 1987 acquitted Jiwan Singh, Bakhshish Singh, Sukhwinder Singh, Dalbir Singh and Joginder Singh, respondents herein under Sections 326 and 326/34 of the Indian Penal Code but maintained their convictions under Sections 323 and 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code as recorded by the Judicial Magistrate I Class, Amritsar, on 25.10.1986. The Additional Sessions Judge ordered the respondents to be released on probation of good conduct for a period of one and a half years on their furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each with one surety in the like amount each, undertaking to appear in the Court and to receive sentence as and when called upon to do so and to keep peace and be of good behaviour in the meantime. They were also directed to pay a sum of Rs. 500/- each as costs of the proceedings.
2. State of Punjab has filed this appeal against the acquittal of the respondents under Sections 326 and 326/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is as follows :-
Jagir Singh, complainant, PW1 had purchased a buffalo from Fauja Singh for a sum of Rs. 2,300/-. After striking the deal he along with Gurbaksh Singh, Karnail Singh, Kahan Singh came to the house of the complainant. After taking the meals at about 8.p.m. all of them came out of the house of the complainant. Bakhshish Singh, accused armed with Gandasi, Dalbir Singh accused armed with Barchhi, Chhinda Singh armed with dang and Jiwan Singh, accused also armed with a dang came there. They were hurling abuses at that time. Jiwan Singh, accused raised a lalkara that Jagir Singh be taught a lesson for deposing in Court. Bakhshish Singh, accused gave a gandasi blow which hit on the head of the complainant. Dalbir Singh, accused gave a barchhi blow which hit on the right leg of the complainant. Chhinda accused gave two dang blows which hit the right thigh and little finger of the left hand of Jagir Singh. Jiwan Singh, accused also gave dang blows which hit the right upper arm of the complainant. The complainant raised raula which attracted Balwant Singh, PW-3 and Dial Singh PW-5 at the spot. They tried to rescue the complainant. Joginder Singh, accused armed with kirpan, Avtar Singh, accused and Dalip Singh accused empty handed also came to the spot. Joginder Singh gave kirpan blow to Balwant Singh which hit on the left side of his head. Dalip Singh gave a brick blow which hit on the face of Karnail Singh. Avtar Singh also gave a brick blow which hit Dial Singh on his right hand. A number of people assembled at the spot. They got the complainant and other injured rescued from the accused. The motive of occurrence has been alleged to be the enmity between the complainant and the accused due to the fact that the complainant had appeared in a case against Jiwan Singh for causing injuries to Balkar Singh.
4. Complainant and other injured were taken to the hospital by Kashmir Singh, their brother, where they were medically examined by Dr. A. C. Sood, PW-7, Dr. A. C. Sood found the following injuries on the person of Jagir Singh :
(1) Incised wound 3" x 1/4" x underlying bone with sharp margin was present in oblique direction on the right frontal bone of the head, 2" above the middle of the right eye-brow. Fresh clotted blood reddish in colour was present in the wound. The outer table of the underlying bone was sharply cut. Shafts and the roots of the hair were cut sharply. No dust in the wound.
(2) Swelling 1/4" in diameter was present dorsal surface of left middle finger on the proximal inter phalangeal joint.
(3) Incised would 3/4" x 1/10" x 1/8" deep with sharp margins was present in horizontal direction on the medial surface of right upper leg 1-1/2" above the right knee joint. Fresh clotted blood was present in the wound. No dust in the wound.
(4) Complaint of pain on the ulterior surface of left upper leg in its middle.
(5) Abrasion 1" p