2000 Supreme(P&H) 593
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER PUNJAB
Shyama Mann, FC.
Tara Singh - Petitioners
Versus
Gram Panchayat, Bohllian - Respondents
M.R. No. 22 of 2000.
Decided On : 30 May, 2000
For the Petitioner:Mr. G.S. Nagra, Advocate.
The Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act prevails over the Administration of Evacuee Property Act for Shamlat Deh land, as established in the ruling of Gram Panchayat of village Jamalpur Awana v. Malwinder Singh.
Headnote:
Evacuee Property - Land Dispute - Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, Section 54
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners claimed continuous possession of land that was owned by Muslims and vested in the Custodian after their migration to Pakistan. The land was wrongly mutated in favor of Gram Panchayats, and the petitioners sought transfer based on long continuous possession.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the controversy was covered by the ruling in Gram Panchayat of village Jamalpur Awana v. Malwinder Singh, where it was held that the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act prevails over the Administration of Evacuee Property Act for Shamlat Deh land.
Issues: Dispute over the ownership and transfer of land vested in the Custodian under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, and the applicability of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the legal position established in the ruling of Gram Panchayat of village Jamalpur Awana v. Malwinder Singh, emphasizing that the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act prevails for Shamlat Deh land, regardless of its status under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act.
Final Decision: The revision petitions were dismissed, and the court held that there was no scope for interference in the impugned orders.
Shyama Mann, FC - This six revision petitions under Section 54 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 are directed against separate orders of even dated i.e. 22.12.1999 passed by Mrs. Agya Rajinder Singh, the then Custodian General, Punjab while dismissing the review petitions under Section 27 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950. As all these revision petitions substantively deal with common question of law and facts they can, more appropriately, be disposed of by a common single order a copy of which shall be placed on each of the files. The facts of each of the revision petitions may be briefly referred to for appreciation of the controversy :-
(i) In M.R. No. 22 of 2000 the petitioner claimed to be in continuous possession of land measuring 138K-14M situated in the Revenue Estate of village Bohllian, Tehsil Ajnala, District Amritsar for the last 40 years except for Kashmir Singh who claimed to be in possession of some land for the last 8-10 years. They contended that the entire village was owned by Muslims who migrated to Pakistan at the time of partition of country and the land in question which was owned by the Muslims stood vested in the Custodian. The land continued to be described as evacuee till 1956 and was wrongly mutated in favour of the Gram Panchayat. They further contended that a Civil Suit for permanent injunction filed by Kashmir Singh, petition was decreed vide order dated 29.8.1997 of the Court of Additional District Judge, Ajnala. The petitioners asserted that they were entitled to get the land transferred on the basis of long continuous possession of land under the Govt. policy at reserve price.
(ii) In M.R. No. 23 of 2000 the petitioners claimed to be in continuous cultivating possession of 101K-10M of land situated in village Chahia Taraf Aranian, Tehsil Ajnala District Amritsar, for the last 40 years. They also pleaded that the land was owned by Muslims and on their migration to Pakistan at the time of Partition of the country the land stood vested in Custodian. The land continued to be recorded as evacuee property till 1961-62 when it was wrongly mutated in favour of Gram Panchayat. The petitioners claimed that they were entitled to get the land transferred at reserve price on the basis of their long continuous possession.
(iii) In M.R. No. 24 of 2000 the petitioners claimed to be in possession of land measuring 134K-5M situated in village Bohllian Tehsil Ajnala District Amritsar, for the last 25 years after the migration of the Muslims who were owners of the said land and it stood vested in Custodian after partition. According to them the land continued to be recorded as evacuee property in the Revenue record till 1956 when it was wrongly and illegally mutated in favour of Gram Panchayat.
(iv) In M.R. No. 25 of 2000 the petitioners claimed to be in possession of land measuring 207K-6M situated in village Kotli Koru Tana Tehsil Ajnala District Amritsar for the last 20 years. They asserted that the entire village was owned by Muslims who migrated to Pakistan at the time of partition of the country and the land in question which was owned by Muslims came to be vested in the Custodian after partition in the copies of Jamabandi for the year 1943-44 and 1951-52 it was entered as Shamlat Hasab Rasad Khewat. The petitioners alleged that the land continued to be recorded in the revenue record as evacuee property till 1961-62 when it was wrongly and illegally mutated in favour of Gram Panchayat. According to them the land bearing entry Shamlat Deh Hasab Rasad Khewat belongs to proprietors of the village and does not vest in Gram Panchayat. The petitioners asserted that they were in continuous possession of land and were entitled to get the land at reserve price under the Govt. Policy.
(v) In M.R. No. 26 of 2000 the petitioners claimed to be in possession of land measuring 205K-7M of land situated in village Kotli Koru Tana for the last 20 years. They contended that the entire villa