SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 1397

ARVIND KUMAR
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Mohinder Pal Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. T.P. Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Arvind Kumar, J. - This order shall dispose of above-said Civil Revision Nos. 1920, 1922 and 2791 of 2007. Civil Revision Nos. 1920 and 1922 of 2007 have been preferred by Ashok Kumar against the orders dated 12.02.2007 and 28.03.2007 respectively, while Civil Revision No. 2791 of 2007 has been filed by Jagan Nath against the order dated 26.04.2007.

2. It is apposite to mentioned here that the petitioner Ashok Kumar earlier filed the application before the learned Rent Controller for incorporating certain facts by way of amendment and that application was dismissed by the learned Rent Controller vide order dated 12.02.2007, which has been impugned in Civil Revision No. 1920 of 2007. There after, Ashok Kumar again moved an application for amendment of the written statement, in the same ejectment petition, which was dismissed vide impugned order dated 28.3.2007 and has been challenged in Civil Revision No. 1922 of 2007.

3. Both the petitioners have been sued by the respondents in separate ejectment petitions, which have been filed with the averments that both the petitioners are tenants under them over two shops situated near Ghas Mandi, Nabha and sought their ejectment there













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top