We have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the pleas raised in the petition. His challenge is to the following orders :-

(i) Order of Commissioner Ambala dated 28.2.2008

(ii) Order of Collector, Kaithal dated 12.4.2005

(iii) Order of SDO (C) Kaithal and Prescribed Authority dated 19.10.2004.

(iv) Order dated 17.1.1979 of Prescribed Authority, Narwana

(v) Order dated 27.6.1978 of Prescribed Authority Narwana.

2. The main order under challenge in this case is the one passed by Prescribed Authority, Narwana on 27.6.1978 by which certain area of the petitioner was declared surplus. The first time the petitioner agitated against this order was by way of an application under section 18 of the Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act for correction of clerical mistake in calculating the total holding of the applicant on 17.4.03. However, what was actually sought was to give effect to a Civil court decree in favour of Smt. Narma mother of the petitioner. The Prescribed Authority dismissed the application holding that there was no clerical error in the order dated 27.6.1978. Appeal filed before Collector, Kaithal as also the revision before the Commissioner also