SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 3365

G.S.SANDHU
Harbans Singh – Appellant
Versus
Parminder Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R.S. Chauhan, Advocate.

ORDER

G.S. Sandhu, F.C. - This is a revision petition under Section 16 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act 1887, against order dated 17.11.2005 of Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar.

2. The brief facts of this case, are that, mutation No. 1858 of village Lehal Kala, Tehsil Phillaur, District Jalandhar, was entered by Patwari halqa on the basis of registered sale deed dated 5.2.2003 in favour of Parminder Kaur respondent No. 1. The petitioner, Harbans Singh, contested the said mutation. As such the mutation was referred to AC-1st (SDM) Phillaur. Before AC-1st, Parminder Kaur did not appear and the case was dismissed in default, vide order dated 30.10.2003. Parminder Kaur respondent No. 1 then filed an application for restoration of the said case and the AC-1st Phillaur dismissed that application vide his order dated 4.8.2004, on the plea that the application for restoration should have been made within thirty days from the date of order. Aggrieved by this order, Parminder Kaur respondent No. 1 filed an appeal before Collector Jalandhar, and the Collector accepted the appeal vide his order dated 10.5.2005 and set aside the order dated 30.10.2003 passed by AC-1st Phillaur. The Coll




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top