SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 4285

VINOD K.SHARMA
Rachitech Engineering Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kundan Steel Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. P.K. Mutneja, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Vinod K. Sharma, J. (Oral) - The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 12.10.2006 passed by the learned appellate authority declining the request of the petitioner for assessment of provisional rent.

2. The learned Rent Controller on the question of arrears of rent was pleased to hold as under :-

"Now, the next question arises whether the then Rent Controller ought to have made provisional assessment. In this regard, it may be observed that when the tenant has denied the relationship of landlord and tenant, the Rent Controller is not required to draw a provisional order of assessment and to give an opportunity to make the payment of arrears of rent. Reliance in this regard, may be placed on the observations made in Devender Puri v. B.N. Rampal, PLR 2004(3) 591. In the instant case, the respondent has not tendered the rent, rather it has taken a stand that it has already paid the sale consideration to the bank on account of money owned (owed ?) by the petitioner to the bank. Even RW-1 in his cross-examination has admitted that after January, 1995, they have not made the payment of rent. Hence, the respondent must suffer the ejectment for non-paymen




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top