Nirmal Yadav, J. - This is plaintiffs appeal against the judgment and decree dated 17.7.1993 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ropar, vide which the judgment and decree dated 7.12.1989 passed in favour of the plaintiff-appellants was reversed and their suit had been dismissed.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that Shobha Ram, predecessor-in- interest of the plaintiff-appellants had purchased a plot along with adjoining property vide sale-deed dated 11.11.1895 from Smt. Ralli widow of Nathu Ghumiar and since then, the plaintiffs predecessor-in-interest and thereafter the plaintiffs are in possession of the property in question. It is further pleaded that the defendant/respondents in connivance with the local police initiated proceedings under Section 145 Criminal Procedure Code with regard to a part of property on 10.3.1983. On 9.3.1984, S.D.M. Ropar, without recording any evidence, declared the defendants predecessors-in-interest Rakha Ram and Basant Kaur to be in possession of a part of the property. In pursuance of the said order, Rakha Ram and his wife entered into forcible possession of the property in dispute with the intervention of the loca