SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 3654

VINOD K.SHARMA
Balraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
Pritam Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Vikas Bhal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Vinod K. Sharma, J. (Oral) - The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 23.12.205 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Nawanshshar vide which application moved by the petitioner under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 C.P.C. was rejected keeping in view the terms of the agreement to sell on receipt of Rs. 14,50,000/- to the petitioner. The petitioner had handed over the possession to the respondent and this fact was duly incorporated in the agreement to sell. The appeal filed by the petitioner was also dismissed.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the learned Courts below on the plea that latest Khasra-Girdawaries i.e. for the year 2005-06 shows that the petitioner to be in possession of the properties in dispute. He has further stated that he is in possession of J form issued by the Grewal and Co. showing the sale of the agricultural produce by the petitioner. It is also contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that recital in the agreement is very weak type of evidence on which no prima facie reliance has been placed.

3. I have considered the contentions of the petitioner and find no force in the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top