SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 106

M.M.KUMAR
Darshan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sadha Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Respondent No. 4:Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

M.M. Kumar, J. - This is a revision petition directed against the order dated 24.2.1981 passed by the Distt. Judge, Patiala on appeal filed by the respondent-defendant against the order dated 6.12.1981, which was passed by the Sub Judge, 2nd Class, Patiala. The appeal has been allowed and the order of the Sub-Judge, 2nd Class dated 6.1.1981 has been reversed. It is pertinent to mention that the Sub Judge, 2nd Class, Patiala has held that the respondents had violated the interim order dated 17.11.1975 passed by it directing the parties to maintain status quo regarding possession of the land in dispute. The respondents were found guilty and were sentenced to civil imprisonment for a period of three months each.

2. The petitioner-plaintiff filed a Suit for possession of one half of the land in dispute alleging that they used to serve Fateh Singh and in lieu of the services rendered by them to Fateh Singh, he executed a valid will in their favour on 4.8.1966 and the respondent-defendant Nos. 1 and 2 had no concern with the Suit land. The averments made by the petitioner-plaintiff were controverted and it was asserted that the petitioner-plaintiff had no right to claim possessi







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top