SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 662

M.M.KUMAR
Sharvan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sumeet Kumar Garg – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Raman Mahajan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Chetan Mittal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

M.M. Kumar, J. - Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 30.3.202 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Chandigarh allowing the application of the plaintiff-respondent directing the defendant-petitioner to produce the original registration certificate of scooter make Priya No. HYQ-5986, Car No. HR-07-5986 and also cash book, ledger book and other accounts relating to the period w.e.f. 28.7.1998 to 21.6.1999. The defendant-petitioner has filed this revision petition invoking the provisions of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity, the Code).

2. In order to put the whole controversy in its proper perspective and to focus on the legal issues involved, necessary facts may first be noticed. Plaintiff-respondent field Civil Suit No. 139 darted 2.12.1999 for recovery of an amount of Rs. 21,60,000/-. The suit has been filed under Order 36 of the Code on the basis of family settlements dated 2.8.1998 and 21-23.8.1999 and cheque No. 786212 dated 31.7.1999. Defendant-petitioner was granted leave to contest on 5.1.2000 by the Civil Judge on the condition of furnishing of indemnity bonds to the tune of Rs. 20 lac with one surety. The case of the plai






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top