SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 542

J.S.NARANG
Amrik Singh – Appellant
Versus
Nirmal Kumari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Defendant :Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate.
For the Appellant :Mr. K.S. Cheema, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

J.S. Narang, J. - After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the respective pleas taken by them as also the perusal of the salary statement submitted by both the parties. I find that collectively both are earning about Rs. 1,60,000/- per month after deductions. It may be noticed that the deductions made in respect of GPF are not to be taken into consideration while deciding the application for seeking maintenance pendente lite, in the fact of this case the GPF deductions are being made almost equal in amount. Thus, the carry home salary earned by both of them is almost equal i.e. about Rs. 8000/- each. After giving the benefit of their personal expenses, for the education of each child and for incurring expenditures for their existence. It shall be appropriate if both of them are required to contribute Rs. 2000/- each for each child meaning thereby for three children Rs. 6000/- shall be required every month. It is admitted by the parties that all the three children are being looked after by the mother and they are in her custody and that they are studying in their respective schools under her supervision and that she is incurring the expenditure till now








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top