SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(P&H) 501

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
G.S. Singhvi, J.
Bhan Singh and another - Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 4144 of 1985.
Decided On : 28 April, 2004

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Shri Jaswant Jain, Advocate.
For the Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 and 5:Shri Rajbir Sehrawat, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

The central legal point established in the judgment is that the imposition of penalty under Section 7(2) of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act requires a determination of the benefit derived from the land by the unauthorised occupant.

Headnote:

Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act - Eviction - Section 7(2)

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners were ordered to be evicted from land by the Gram Panchayat under Section 7 of the Act and a penalty was imposed on them. The petitioners challenged the penalty part of the order on the ground of non-compliance with Section 7(2) of the Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the penalty imposed on the petitioners was vitiated due to violation of Section 7(2) of the Act and quashed the orders imposing the penalty.

Issues: The main issue was the imposition of penalty on the petitioners under Section 7(2) of the Act and the non-compliance with the provisions of the said section.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that before imposing a penalty under Section 7(2), it is necessary to determine the benefit which the unauthorised occupant could have derived from the land, and the failure to do so would render the penalty order null and void.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the orders imposing the penalty on the petitioners, and left the parties to bear their own costs.

JUDGMENT

G.S. Singhvi, J. - This is a petition for quashing penalty part of order dated 23.3.1985 (Annexure P.1) passed by Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Hissar (respondent No. 1) and order dated 14.5.1985 (Annexure P.2) passed by Collector, Hissar (respondent No. 2) respectively under the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (for short, the Act).

2. A perusal of the averments contained in the writ petition, which have remained uncontroverted due to non-filing of the written statement by the respondents show that Gram Panchayat, Charnaund, Tehsil and District Hissar (respondent No. 3) filed an application under Section 7 of the Act for eviction of the petitioners from land measuring 127 kanals 10 marlas on the ground that they were in unauthorised occupation thereof. Respondent No. 3 also prayed for imposition of penalty on the petitioners.

3. On notice, the petitioners filed reply to contest the application. After considering the pleadings and evidence of the parties and hearing their counsel/representative, respondent No. 3 passed order Annexure P.1 vide which he directed the eviction of the petitioners and also imposed penalty at the rate of Rs. 2000/- per hectare per year by invoking the provisions of Section 7(2) of the Act. The operative part of order Annexure P.1 reads as under :-

"Hence it is ordered that the respondents be ejected from the land in dispute and they are directed to vacate the land in dispute within ten days and deliver the possession to the Gram Panchayat failing which, the possession would be got delivered with the use of police force. As regards the imposition of penalty under Section 7(2), it is ordered that a penalty of Rs. 12,750/- is imposed on the respondents at the rate of 2,000/- er hectare per year and it is directed that the penalty should be paid to the Gram Panchayat within 30 days."

4. The appeal filed by the petitioners was dismissed by respondent No. 1 vide order Annexure P.2. Paragraph 4 of that order reads as under :-

"I have heard at length the arguments advanced on behalf of both the parties and have carefully gone through the facts on the record and thereafter I have come to the conclusion that there is no doubt that the land in dispute belongs to the Gram Panchayat. It is also proved from the record of the Gram Panchayat that the Panchayat had never given the land to the appellants as tenants. Rather this land has been being given on lease. In these circumstances, the entries in the Jamabandi cannot be considered to be correct and in this manner the presumption of truth attached to them stands contradicted. The appellants have also not proved as to how they became tenants under the Panchayat. If the Panchayat had entered into any such agreement, they should have been produced. Hence finding no infirmity in the order of the Court below, I dismiss the appeal."

5. The petitioners have challenged the penalty part of order Annexure P.1 on the ground that the same is vitiated due to non-compliance of Section 7(2) of the Act.

6. I have heard Shri Jaswant Jain, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Rajbir Sehrawat, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 5. Section 7(2) of the Act on which reliance has been placed by the petitioners in support of their assertion that the penalty part of order Annexure P.1 is ultra-vires to the said provision reads as under :-

"The Assistant Collector of the first grade may, by an order, in writing, require any person to pay a penalty, in respect of the land or other immovable property which was or has been in his wrongful or unauthorised possession, at a rate not less than six hundred rupees and more than two thousand and five hundred rupees per hectare per annum, having regard to the benefit which could be derived from the land or other immovable property. If the penalty is not paid within the period of thirty days from the date of the order, the same shall be recoverable as arrears of lan





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top